Explanation for:

Matthew

23

:

21

And whosoever shall swear by temple, sweareth by it, and by him that dwelleth in it:

5-Sterne

century

Powered by

+ 120.000 in total

6

more explanations
& daily audio-books

only 4$* per month

App Store

Play Store

Audio storys

spoken by

– enjoy in Theosis App –

Start your
Bible-journey


with explanations
& daily audio-books
only 4$* per month

Powered by

{"arr":[{"author-name":"Michail (Lusin)","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c89550c567e172d15b3055_Michail%20(Lusin).png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"Swearing by the altar implies that such an oath is more sacred and carries greater weight than swearing by the gift placed upon it, as the former also encompasses the offerings made on the altar. Furthermore, an oath made by the temple is deemed more holy and mandatory than one made by the altar, because swearing by the temple also means swearing by the divine presence residing within it, namely God. The temple serves as the dwelling place of God's unique presence among His people. In Solomon's original temple, God's manifest presence was revealed above the Ark of the Covenant in the Holy of Holies, signified by a cloud (1 Kings 8:10-13, Psalm 81:1). Although the second temple lacked the Ark, the Lord still revealed His presence there, particularly as the high priest was permitted to enter the Holy of Holies once a year, bringing the blood of the atoning sacrifice (Hebrews 9:7). Thus, swearing by the temple parallels swearing by heaven, which is described as the throne of God (see note on Matthew 5:34-35). Heaven represents the realm of God's glorious presence, where His majesty and unapproachable light reside. In all these statements, the Lord emphasizes that to swear by any entity is to ultimately swear by God; otherwise, the oath lacks significance. The crucial aspect of an oath is the invocation of God as a witness to the truthfulness and integrity of the one who makes the promise; without this, the oath is void. For a broader exploration of oaths, refer to the note on Matthew 5:33."},{"author-name":"Abbot Panteleimon about the Trinity","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c96d263b8c22d9c467bdab_no-pic-theosis.png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"From the altar, the offering is made holy; thus, the altar holds greater significance and sanctity than the gift that it sanctifies. Why, then, should there be a misguided categorization of vows into those that are significant and those that are trivial? This serves your own interests. Through your self-serving assessments, you have so distorted the essence of every promise that you have overlooked the fundamental truth: it is not merely the object of the vow that matters, but rather the One to Whom it is dedicated. Humanity calls upon God Himself as a witness to their integrity and earnestness; consequently, every vow, regardless of its perceived weight, stands on equal ground: THOSE WHO affirm by the sacrifice do so with it and everything that accompanies it; and THOSE WHO affirm by the temple do not only invoke it, but also the Lord God who resides within, so that he who swears by the temple effectively swears by heaven itself;"},{"author-name":"Gladkow B.I.","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c88bf0ceef8c96e09a6521_Gladkow%20B.I..png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"Woe to you, sightless guides, who have taken on the responsibility of directing the people toward the Kingdom of Heaven, yet in your spiritual blindness fail to discern the genuine path from the false! In your ignorance, you instruct the people that they may disregard their oaths without consequence, selecting which vows to honor only for convenience; you believe that it is permissible to mislead others by invoking the temple and its altar in oaths, since fulfilling such pledges appears to be at one's discretion. Yet you insist on the observance of oaths when someone swears by the gold and ornaments of the temple or by the offerings placed on the altar. Oh, deluded leaders! For the temple is far more sacred than the gold that resides within it, sanctified solely by what the temple represents; and the altar, which sanctifies the offering upon it, holds greater significance than the offering itself. How can you not perceive that anyone who swears by the altar is thereby swearing by everything laid upon it? And likewise, one who swears by the temple commits to all the gold contained therein, as well as to God Himself who is invisibly present, just as one who swears by heaven swears by its all-encompassing Creator. The blessed Theophylact affirms that anyone who swore by a golden vessel or a sacrificial animal and subsequently violated that oath must provide restitution to the temple associated with their oath. The Pharisees prioritized gold and sacrifices over the temple, motivated by the profits derived from those offerings. Since it was infeasible to demand restitution from one who swore by the temple yet broke their vow, and without the ability to gain from such a breach, they permitted the violation of such oaths."},{"author-name":"Paul Matwejewski","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c8969f5be0d592d5a10576_Paul%20Matwejewski.png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"The fourth lamentation addresses spiritual blindness and the distortion of the true significance of oaths. The scribes and Pharisees permitted oaths made by created entities—such as heaven, earth, the sun, Jerusalem, and the temple—classifying these oaths into greater and lesser categories. Motivated by self-interest, they elevated certain oaths related to the temple treasures and sacrificial offerings above others. Previously, Jesus Christ had noted that these misguided interpreters of the law prioritized sacrificial pledges over the unchanging commandment of God to honor one’s father and mother (Matthew 15:4-6). On this occasion, He strongly condemned the deliberate ignorance displayed by the blind leaders of the people, declaring: “Woe unto you, ye leaders of the blind men,” who say, “Whosoever swears by the church is nothing, and whosoever swears by the gold of the church must be.” He questioned their understanding: “But you blind men, which is greater: the gold or the church that sanctifies the gold?” Furthermore, He stated, “Whosoever swears by the altar shall eat nothing, but whosoever swears by the gift that is on it shall eat.” He reiterated their folly: “But you blind men, which is greater, the gift or the altar, the holy gift?” The esteemed Theophylact explained that, according to the Pharisees’ teachings, one who swore by a golden vessel, or an ox, or a sheep set aside for sacrifice and later broke that oath was required to present to the temple what he had sworn by. They valued the gift over the altar for the sake of the advantage gained from the offerings. The essence of an oath is to call upon the all-knowing and ever-present God as a witness of the truth. Thus, restoring the meaning of an oath in contemporary terms, the Lord pointed out: “If anyone swears by the altar, he swears by it and by Him who is upon it; and if anyone swears by the church, he swears by it and by Him who resides in it; and if anyone swears by heaven, he swears by the Throne of God and by Him who sits upon it.”"},{"author-name":"Bogolepow D.P.","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c96d263b8c22d9c467bdab_no-pic-theosis.png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"One of the reasons for distorting the law is through casuistic interpretations."},{"author-name":"Alexander Gorsky","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c8884037c1e1c51e1332e2_Alexander%20Gorsky.png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"Following these events, the Lord departed from the temple, delivering a stern rebuke directed at the Pharisees and the temple priests, who had contributed to the moral decay of the people, accompanied by warnings of impending divine judgment. As He completed His earthly mission, He proclaimed that He would persist in working among them through His ambassadors; however, the Pharisees would continue to oppress both them and the previous witnesses of the truth, thus compounding the transgressions of their forebears. This would ultimately lead to the manifestation of God’s judgment upon the wickedness of Jerusalem."}]}

Support this project and get full access for only 4$/month

Commentarie text can’t be scrolled on PC at the moment. Please use your phone. We’re working on a fix.