←
Explanation for:
Matthew
22
:
45
If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?
13
more explanations
& daily audio-books
spoken by
– enjoy in Theosis App –
Start your
Bible-journey
with explanations
& daily audio-books
only 4$* per month
{"arr":[{"author-name":"Jerome of Stridon","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c88dcd3432c6dd41375498_Jerome%20of%20Stridon.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":4,"exegesis-text":"Those who assembled to challenge Jesus and sought to uncover the truth through a deceptively framed question ended up ensnaring themselves in their own confusion. They posed an inquiry regarding Christ: Whose son is He? This question from Jesus serves as a valuable point for us in our current conflict with the Jews, as they too affirm that the Messiah must come, although they insist He is merely a man and a holy one from the lineage of David. Therefore, we, instructed by the Lord, pose to them: If He is simply a man and just a descendant of David, then why does David refer to Him as his Lord, not out of mistake, nor by his own desire, but by the Holy Spirit? The evidence he presents is drawn from the One Hundred and Ninth Psalm. Thus, the Lord is identified as the son of David, not due to physical birth, but because He is eternally (always) begotten of the Father, existing before the Father Himself in His humanity. To address this dilemma, the Jews resort to a myriad of baseless conjectures, claiming that Abraham had a servant named Eliezer of Damascus, and that the Psalm was penned in his name; suggesting that, after the five kings were defeated, God spoke to Abraham, saying, 'Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies your footstool' (Psalm 109:1). However, how then could God have stated to Abraham the following: 'In the day of Thy power Thy people are ready in the splendour of the holy place; out of the womb before the day is like the dew Thy birth'? Also, 'The Lord hath sworn, and will not change His mind: Thou art a priest forever after the order of Melchisedec' (Psalm 109:3-4). Furthermore, they must contend with the question: How is it that Abraham existed before the day, and was a priest in the manner of Melchisedec, when Melchisedec presented bread and wine to him and received a tithe from him?"},{"author-name":"John Chrysostom","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c88ea76859f9f8e2ffd3ee_John%20Chrysostom.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":4,"exegesis-text":"The Saviour, embracing His suffering, invokes a prophecy where He is explicitly referred to as Lord, and He does so with profound intent. Since those He addresses failed to recognize His divine nature, only deeming Him a mere man, He counters their misconception by referencing David’s declaration of His deity. They had labeled Him simply as the son of David, but the Saviour seeks to correct their understanding by citing the prophet who asserts His divine sonship and the honor that is rightfully His, equal to that of the Father. \\n\\nMoreover, in an effort to instill a sense of reverence among them, He refers to the prophecy stating, “Till I make Thy enemies Thy footstool,” hoping to draw their attention to His truth. To prevent the notion that David's words were merely exaggerated human judgment, He poses, “How doth David call His Lord by the spirit?” illustrating the humility with which He highlights the prophet's acknowledgment of Him. \\n\\nHis approach begins with a question, “What think ye of Him? Whose is the Son?” to prompt their response. When they respond, “He is David's,” He refrains from a straightforward declaration, instead asking, “How shall David call His Lord?” This is to safeguard the doctrine of His divinity from any misinterpretations they might have. The apostles, too, spoke respectfully of David, recognizing his status while noting that he had died and was buried.\\n\\nIn a parallel manner, the Saviour engages in dialogue by inquiring how David might refer to his own Lord through the spirit in the words, “The Lord says unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, till I make Thy enemies Thy footstool.” He follows with the query, “If David call Him Lord, what son is He?” This statement does not negate His lineage as the son of David; rather, it aims to realign the Pharisees' understanding. His question, “What son is he?” indicates that while He is indeed David's descendant, He transcends that identity in their understanding. \\n\\nUpon hearing this, the Pharisees remained silent, not due to a desire for truth, but because they had no rebuttal. Thus, He leads them to recognize His Lordship over David subtly, employing the prophet's words because they were skeptical of His claims and harbored negative perceptions of Him. Despite His humble references to Himself, He adapted to their limited comprehension to convey profound truths.\\n\\nEven at this moment, as He interacts through questions, He continues to reveal His dignity in concealed ways. It is crucial to note that being called Lord of the Jews differs from bearing the title Lord of David. Observe how aptly He delivers this teaching. After asserting the singularity of Lordship, He identifies Himself as Lord, substantiating this not only through His deeds but also through prophetic testimony, concurrently declaring that the Father will enact vengeance, saying, “Till I make Thy enemies Thy footstool,” thereby affirming His equality and dignity with the Father.\\n\\nWith these concluding remarks to the Pharisees, the Saviour presents a doctrine that is both lofty and significant, leaving them without the means to respond. Henceforth, they fell silent, not of their own choosing, but because they were unable to refute Him, suffering a decisive setback that deterred them from pursuing further challenges against Him. This brought considerable benefit to the people, as the Saviour, having dispelled these adversaries and thwarted their nefarious schemes, ultimately addresses the crowd."},{"author-name":"Augustine of Hippo","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c88950a5c988a4fc06c7ae_Augustine%20of%20Hippo.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":5,"exegesis-text":"It is important to proceed carefully to avoid the misconception that Jesus Himself renounces His identity as the Son of David. He did not reject this title; rather, He questioned it. You acknowledge that Christ is the Son of David, and I do not dispute that. Yet He addresses Him as Lord. How can He be a son if He is also his Lord? The people remained silent and did not respond. Let us provide an answer as Christ did, illustrating it through His apostle's teachings. How do we ascertain that it is Christ who provides this clarification? The apostle states, Behold, ye seek a proof of Christ speaking in me (2 Cor. 13:3). Thus, through the voice of the apostle, Christ graciously answers the inquiry. Let us first recall what Christ proclaimed through the apostle to Timothy: Remember Jesus Christ, of the lineage of David, who was raised from the dead, according to my gospel (2 Tim. 2:8). Therefore, Christ is indeed the Son of David. But how can He be both Son and Lord? Let us seek guidance from the apostle! The apostle teaches that He, being the image of God, did not consider it a theft to be equal with God (Phil. 2:6). Acknowledge in Him the Lord David. If you recognize Him as the Lord David, our Lord who reigns over heaven and earth, the Lord of angels, equal to God, and the image of God, then how is He also the Son of David? Pay attention to what is next. The apostle reveals to us the Lord David, affirming that He, the image of God, did not see equality with God as something to be grasped. How then is He the Son of David? He humbled Himself, taking the form of a servant, made in the likeness of men, and being found in appearance as a man; He humbled Himself, obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross. Therefore, God has exalted Him (Phil. 2:7-9). And Christ, the seed of David, the Son of David, was raised because He humbled Himself. How did He humble Himself? By assuming what He was not while retaining what He was. He humbled Himself, showing His humanity. Though divine, He manifested as man. During His earthly ministry, He faced rejection despite being the Creator of all. He was scorned as a man, portrayed as powerless. Not only was He rejected, but He was also put to death! He became the rock over which the Jews stumbled and were broken: and whosoever shall fall on this rock shall be broken; and on whom it falls it shall crush him (Matthew 21:44). Initially, He was brought low, and they stumbled. He will return exalted, and then He will shatter them. Now you see that He is both the Son of David and the Lord of David: the eternal Lord of David and the temporal Son of David. The Lord of David is begotten from the essence of the Father, while the Son of David is born of the Virgin Mary, conceived by the Holy Spirit. Let us firmly hold to both truths! One is our future hope in eternity, the other is our salvation from present estrangement."},{"author-name":"Euthymios Zigabenos","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c96d263b8c22d9c467bdab_no-pic-theosis.png","category":"Christian Authors","century":11,"exegesis-text":"If David refers to Him as Lord, how can He also be considered his son? This statement does not reject the notion that Christ is the son of David; rather, it reveals their mistaken belief, for He is not merely his son as they presumed—a simple human—but also his Lord. He is identified as David’s son for emerging from his lineage in humanity, yet He is also acknowledged as his God. Christ utilized this statement from David to challenge the Pharisees, illustrating that He is both David's descendant and his divine authority. We should also clarify this declaration. David proclaims that the Lord and Father spoke to my Lord and His Son, Christ, when He ascended to heaven, saying, ‘Sit at My right hand, and enjoy My kingdom, having the same throne and the same honour with Me’ (Psalms 109:1). The physical adversaries of Christ include primarily the Jews, followed by Gentiles and heretics, while the spiritual foes are the demons. As noted in Mark (Mark 12:35, 37), Christ made this assertion while teaching in the temple, to which the listeners responded with great joy. It is likely that He first posed the question to the Pharisees before sharing the teaching with the people gathered in the temple."},{"author-name":"Theophylact of Bulgaria","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c8989296bafed9104677d7_Theophylact%20of%20Bulgaria.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":11,"exegesis-text":"The Lord raises a challenge, stating, \\"How can David refer to Him as Lord?\\" This attribution is not merely a matter of inspiration, which comes as a generous gift from the Spirit, but rather a profound revelation of His identity. Through these statements, the Lord acknowledges His association with David while also clarifying that He transcends being a mere descendant of David. The Lord poses this question so that the Pharisees might either admit their ignorance, seek further understanding from Him, or, upon genuine acknowledgment, come to faith. Alternatively, they may leave in embarrassment if they cannot provide an answer and refrain from questioning Him in the future."},{"author-name":"Nicephoros (Theotokis)","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c8958407451968d9c204fb_Nicephoros%20(Theotokis).png","category":"Christian Authors","century":18,"exegesis-text":"The God-father David, inspired by the Holy Spirit, also predicted events surrounding the ascension of Christ, declaring, ‘The Lord, that is, the Lord and the Father, shall say to my Lord, that is, to His only begotten Son, my Lord Jesus Christ, “Sit at my right hand, until I make Thy enemies Thy footstool”’ (Ps. 109:1). This statement by the Savior highlights both His Divinity and humanity, serving to correct the misguided beliefs of the Pharisees, who perceived Christ, as foretold by the holy Prophets, merely as a human figure. By addressing Him as ‘my Lord,’ David expressed that the one who incarnated as Christ would be not only his Son but also his Sovereign, affirming that He is both the Son of God and God Himself. Furthermore, David’s mention of Christ sitting at His right hand signifies His humanity; for as God, He has eternally existed in unity and co-eternity with the Father, and as man, after His ascension, He ‘sat down at the right hand of the throne of majesty on high’ (Hebrews 1:3), thereby receiving the same unchanging, glorious exaltation that His Divinity had prior to creation. This desire for glory was expressed in His suffering when He prayed: ‘And now glorify Me, Father, with Thy own glory, which I had with Thee before the world existed’ (John 17:5). The term ‘until’ is frequently interpreted as signifying eternity in both the Old and New Testament. Thus, for all eternity, the Father has vanquished His Son’s adversaries, including the principalities, powers, and rulers of this dark age, culminating in the defeat of death itself (Gen. 8:7; Ps. 122:2; Is. 46:4; Mt. 1:25; Mt. 18:30; Heb. 10:13; Eph. 6:12). The death of the Lord not only liberated humanity from demonic influence but also transitioned it from death to life: ‘He that believeth in Him, though he die, yet shall he live’ (John 11:25). Having proclaimed these prophetic truths to the Pharisees, Jesus concluded by asking: ‘If David called Christ Himself his Lord, what Son is He?’ It is important to note that He does not refute being the Son of David, acknowledging His incarnation from the Holy Virgin, a descendant of David; however, He aims to rectify the Pharisees’ misunderstanding. They claimed He was only the Son of David and not even Lord; yet David is both the progenitor of the Lord Jesus and His servant: the father in relation to the flesh, the servant concerning the Godhead (Zlat. in conversation). Through these prophetic declarations, Jesus adeptly compelled the Pharisees to recognize Him as both God and man."},{"author-name":"Lopuchin A.P.","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c891400ee1341634d2276d_Lopuchin%20A.P..png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"Sonship merely indicates the physical descent of Christ from David, yet it is clear from a well-known psalm (Psalms 109:1) that David refers to Him as his Lord, who is seated at the right hand of God. Therefore, the reign of Christ transcends earthly realms, being of a heavenly nature. The learned scribes and legal experts, failing to grasp this truth, displayed a significant lack of understanding regarding the true exaltation of the Messiah. Had they comprehended this reality, they would have recognized that the qualities attributed to the Messiah align perfectly with the identity of Jesus of Nazareth, whom they persecuted."},{"author-name":"Michail (Lusin)","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c89550c567e172d15b3055_Michail%20(Lusin).png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"How do you reconcile David referring to his son as his Lord? The term Lord implies that David's son possesses a greater exaltation than David himself. If the Messiah were only a descendant of David, as some others are, or if He were merely a human being as the Jews believe, or if He had not yet come into being at the time of David's writings, how could David call Him his Lord? Conversely, if He is indeed David's Lord and existed when David made this declaration, how could He also be viewed as David’s descendant? This perplexity was beyond the reach of the Pharisees. The truth is that, in terms of His earthly lineage, the Messiah is a son of David; yet in terms of His divine nature, as the incarnate Son of God, He stands as Lord over David. However, the Pharisees failed to acknowledge this dual aspect of the Messiah's relationship to David, having lost sight of the profound mystery of the God-man. Thus, they received such a decisive revelation that they ceased their inquiries, for it is stated, \\"from that day no one dared to question Him.\\""},{"author-name":"Abbot Panteleimon about the Trinity","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c96d263b8c22d9c467bdab_no-pic-theosis.png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"The Savior presents His identity through a thought-provoking question, prompting listeners to discern the truth themselves: Now, IF DAVID CALLS HIM LORD, HOW IS HE HIS SON TO HIM? How can one reconcile the fact that David refers to his descendant as his Lord? If you believe the Messiah is merely a human, a descendant of David, and that He did not exist when David wrote about Him, how could David profess Him as his Lord? Would Abraham have referred to Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, or even David himself as his Lord? If the Messiah is indeed David's Lord and existed during David’s time, how can He also be considered a descendant of David? It becomes evident that while the Messiah, in His human lineage, is the Son or Descendant of David, in His divine nature as the incarnate Son of God, He stands as David's Lord. By acknowledging the Messiah as Lord, David indicated that the Christ expected to emerge from him is both his Lord and Master—truly the Son of God and God Himself. When David stated, 'sit at My right hand,’ this affirmed His humanity; for the Son of God, as divine, has existed eternally in unity and co-eternity with God the Father, and as Man, He, following His ascension, “sat down at the right hand” of the “throne of majesty on high” (Heb. 1:3), when His humanity was adorned with the same unchanging and indescribable glory that His divinity possessed from all eternity. This is what our Savior also entreated from God the Father before His Passion: ‘And now glorify Me, O Father, with Thy own glory, which I had with Thee before the world existed’ (John 17:5). St. Chrysostom notes how fittingly the Lord reveals His own divinity. After proclaiming that the Lord is One, He asserts His own lordship, substantiating this claim not only through His works but also through prophetic testimony; concurrently, He declares that the Father will exact vengeance on His adversaries, saying, ‘until I make Thy enemies Thy footstool.’ Through these words, the Savior affirms His unity and equal standing with the Father, concluding His dialogue with the Pharisees by imparting a doctrine that is profound and majestic, capable of silencing them. Indeed, from that moment, they became mute—not by choice but because they had no valid counterarguments; thus, such a definitive statement left them unable to refute Him, which is noted, And NO ONE CAN ANSWER HIM A WORD; and from that day NO ONE HAS DARED TO QUESTION HIM."},{"author-name":"Gladkow B.I.","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c88bf0ceef8c96e09a6521_Gladkow%20B.I..png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"If He was indeed the Lord of David and was present when David composed these words, how could He also be a descendant of David who had not yet come into being?"},{"author-name":"Paul Matwejewski","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c8969f5be0d592d5a10576_Paul%20Matwejewski.png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"When the Savior perceived that His listeners were descending into disbelief, fixated only on earthly lineage, He raised an objection: \\"How does David, in the Spirit, refer to Him as Lord? David himself—by the Holy Spirit—proclaims in the Psalms, 'The Lord says to my Lord, Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies your footstool.' These words, drawn from the prophetic Psalm 109:1, vividly illustrate the everlasting majesty of Christ. To sit at God's right hand indicates equality, while having enemies humbled beneath one’s feet signifies supreme authority over the entire cosmos, both seen and unseen (1 Cor. 15:25; Heb. 10:13). These aspects should have illuminated for the Pharisees and scribes the truth that the Messiah, while having a physical descent from David, is infinitely transcendent to David in His Divine nature. Therefore, Jesus concluded His discourse with another question: \\"But if David himself calls Him Lord, how is He his Son?\\" This left them speechless. Their obstinate refusal to admit their lack of understanding of the Scriptures drove them into silence, concealing their malice. However, the crowd, recognizing the side of truth, listened to the Lord with great delight. The Psalm verses cited by Jesus were later referenced by the holy Apostles Peter (Acts 2:34-35) and Paul (Hebrews 1:13) to affirm His Divine nature."},{"author-name":"Bogolepow D.P.","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c96d263b8c22d9c467bdab_no-pic-theosis.png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"Through this inquiry, Jesus Christ does not intend to dismiss the widespread understanding among the Jews that the Messiah should be a descendant of David. Rather, He aims to refine and elevate their perception of Him. The Pharisees, and subsequently the broader nation, failed to recognize that the Messiah, according to David's own divinely inspired declaration, was also his Lord—namely, the Son of God. The context for this question posed to Jesus likely arose from the Pharisees recalling the Lord's testimony about Himself as the Son of God and seeking to elicit a reaffirmation of this claim to use it against Him as an accusation of blasphemy."},{"author-name":"Alexander Gorsky","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c8884037c1e1c51e1332e2_Alexander%20Gorsky.png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"In the midst of these discussions, the topic of the countenance of the Messiah was briefly raised. The Lord inquired of the Pharisees present, \\"How is it that David, inspired by the Spirit, refers to the Messiah as both the son of David and his Lord?\\" This inquiry seems to have been presented by the Lord to substantiate, through Scripture, His teaching on the exalted, divine essence of the Messiah, a truth dismissed by those who were blinded by a rigid adherence to the letter of the law—much like during the Feast of Tabernacles—and the restoration of the temple. Yet, this question remained unaddressed. Just as they hesitated to respond regarding John to avoid contradiction, they also refrained from providing an answer about the Messiah Himself."}]}
Support this project and get full access for only 4$/month
Commentarie text can’t be scrolled on PC at the moment. Please use your phone. We’re working on a fix.
