←
Explanation for:
Matthew
21
:
19
And seeing a certain fig tree by the way side, he came to it, and found nothing on it but leaves only, and he saith to it: May no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And immediately the fig tree withered away.
14
more explanations
& daily audio-books
spoken by
– enjoy in Theosis App –
Start your
Bible-journey
with explanations
& daily audio-books
only 4$* per month
{"arr":[{"author-name":"John Chrysostom","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c88ea76859f9f8e2ffd3ee_John%20Chrysostom.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":4,"exegesis-text":"As Jesus came across a fig tree along the road, He approached it only to find it was bare, containing nothing but leaves. Another Gospel writer notes that “it was not yet time” (Mark 11:13) for figs. This raises a question: if it was not the season for harvesting figs, why does the Gospel state that Jesus found it barren? This remark reflects the understanding of the disciples, who were still growing in their faith. Evangelists often reflect the thoughts of the disciples. The disciples not only believed the tree was cursed due to its lack of fruit but also sought to comprehend its significance.\\n\\nThe fig tree’s curse serves a purpose for the benefit of the disciples, primarily to strengthen their faith. Christ, who is inherently good and never punishes unjustly, needed to demonstrate the reality of His judgment and retribution. This was to ensure that both His disciples and the Jewish people recognized His power— that while He had the authority to bring ruin upon those who crucified Him, He chose instead to submit to His crucifixion, not demonstrating His might against humans, but letting His justice be known through the withering of the tree.\\n\\nTherefore, it is unwise to question such occurrences involving places, plants, or unthinking animals. One should not wonder whether it is fair for the fig tree to be dried up if it is not the proper time for fruit. Such speculations can detract from the true essence of the miracle; instead, we should focus on the wonder of the miracle and praise the one who performs it. Many interpret the drowning of swine similarly, seeking to understand the justice behind it, but we should refrain from their misguided judgments. Just as plants lack souls, so do unintelligent animals.\\n\\nWhy, then, is this specific rationale provided for the withering of the fig tree? As established, the Gospel accounts often reflect the perspective of the disciples. Some may argue that since it is not yet harvest time, the law being represented by the fig tree is invalid. However, the fruit of the law is faith, which had already been produced; thus, the appropriate season for gathering this fruit had indeed arrived. “The fields are ripe for harvest” (John 4:35), and “I have sent you to reap that which you have not labored over” (John 4:38).\\n\\nHere, the law is not being emphasized but rather, as previously indicated, Christ’s act of cursing the fig tree illustrates His power and authority to enact vengeance. This intention is highlighted in the phrase “for it was not yet time,” indicating that Jesus approached the fig tree not out of hunger but with a deliberate aim to teach His disciples. They were utterly astonished by the tree’s sudden wilting, especially when there were far greater miracles that had already taken place. For the disciples, witnessing this particular event was both new and unexpected since it was the first occasion Christ manifestly demonstrated His justice. Thus, the Lord chose to perform this notable miracle on the fig tree, the most fruitful among plants, making the act even more remarkable."},{"author-name":"Jerome of Stridon","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c88dcd3432c6dd41375498_Jerome%20of%20Stridon.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":4,"exegesis-text":"The following morning, as He returned to the city, He felt hunger. Spotting a fig tree along the way, He approached it but found only leaves. He then declared, “Let no fruit be born of thee forever,” and the fig tree withered away at once. When His disciples witnessed this, they were taken aback, asking, “How is it that it withered immediately?” After the darkness of night had passed and the morning light began to break, approaching noon—the time when the Lord was to illuminate the world through His suffering—He journeyed back to Jerusalem, experiencing either the truth of His humanity or a profound longing for salvation, akin to an intense desire for the redemption of believers, while also feeling the anguish caused by Israel's disbelief.\\n\\nAs He encountered a specific tree—which can symbolize the synagogue and the gathering of the Jews—He discovered that the synagogue, holding the law, stood as a waypoint. Yet, lacking faith in the Way, it remained stagnant, offering nothing but the noise of empty promises, the deceit of the Pharisees, and their pride in the law, devoid of the genuine fruits of truth. This is supported by another evangelist's note that “it was not yet time” (Mark 11:13), suggesting either that Israel’s period of salvation had not yet arrived, as the Gentiles had yet to be included, or that the time of belief had already passed, since the Savior had first approached them and, met with rejection, turned His attention toward the Gentiles.\\n\\nHe pronounced, “Let no fruit be borne of you eternally,” utilizing the Greek word αίών which can imply both ages or eternally. The fig tree, deprived of nourishment—a nourishment the Lord had longed to partake of—swiftly withered, leaving only the trunk. However, it is said that after the branches fall away, the root can regain strength; ultimately, in the end, if it has faith, it shall bear the fruits of belief, fulfilling the scripture that states, “There is hope for the tree” (Job 14:7). In a literal interpretation, the Lord, destined to suffer among the nations and carry the burden of the cross's trials, aimed to prepare the hearts of His disciples for what was to come through this sign. This led the disciples to wonder, “How is it that it immediately withered away?” Thus, the Savior possessed the same authority to dry up His adversaries, had He not anticipated their potential for salvation through repentance."},{"author-name":"Ephraem the Syrian","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c88b589fc3e99eb7bb1839_Ephraem%20the%20Syrian.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":4,"exegesis-text":"'He cursed the fig tree,' as it is written, “When thou gatherest the harvest of thy field, thou shalt leave what is left, ...and when thou givest up thy olives, thou shalt do likewise; so shalt thou do in all that thou possessest” (cf. Deuteronomy 24:19-21). Yet the owner of that fig tree disregarded this command through disobedience, and when the Lord arrived and discovered no fruit upon it, He cursed it, ensuring that the owner would not partake of its fruit, since nothing was left for the orphans and widows. Similarly, the Gergesenes (Matthew 8:34) chose not to confront the Lord; thus He sent their swine into the sea, prompting them, even against their will, to approach Him. In the same way, the owner of the fig tree opted not to seek Christ, yet He dried up the fig tree so that the owner might be compelled to come to Him, as the Lord consistently desired the salvation of all. Therefore, to demonstrate the might of His divinity, He cursed the fig tree so that it withered, allowing those who witnessed it to also believe in the things that were yet unseen. Again, He cursed it so that no fruit would grow on it again according to natural law, as it had failed to honor the law of Moses. He sought fruit from this fig tree prematurely to serve as a representation of Him who, in due time, would fulfill and resolve the law. For had He sought fruit at the appropriate time, no one would have perceived it as a symbol or image. Through the fig tree, He reproached the city of Jerusalem, where He sought love but encountered animosity towards those who bore the fruits of repentance.\\n\\nHe was hungry and quickly approached the fig tree but found nothing on it. Certainly, this hunger belonged to His human nature, driven by genuine necessity; however, that He looked for fruit out of season raises the question of how this could occur with One who knows the deepest thoughts of the heart. Therefore, recognize that the Lord cursed the fig tree not due to His hunger; even if it had been the season for fruit, He should not have withered the tree solely because the fruit He sought was absent. Some interpret the fig tree as symbolizing Jerusalem, arguing that it did not yield fruit, and thus contend that He was hungry for repentance, seeking it from the people of Jerusalem, yet found none. They also reference another saying, 'one man had a fig tree ...in his vineyard' (cf. Luke 13:6) — both referring to the city of Jerusalem. But if He sought fruit from Jerusalem, why did He curse it through the image of a fig tree that was not yet in its season? And if its time had not yet arrived, how do we reconcile this with the apostle’s declaration, ‘at the end of time he sent ... God sent his Son’ (cf. Galatians 4:4)? Since the coming of the Only Begotten was at the appointed time, why compare the fig tree, which was not ready for fruit, to a city where the time had come for it to bear? Let us examine this scripture closely to uncover the answer to our inquiry. It is noted that as the Lord entered Jerusalem, “The Lord saw him, and wept for him, and said unto him, O if ... you... recognised... this ... thy day” (cf. Luke 19:41-42). Thus, if his day has arrived, how much more has his time also come? Whereas the fig tree has not come to fruit, it is clear that something different is signified by the fig tree compared to, and separate from, Jerusalem. \\n\\nIn our examination of the fig tree, we conclude that it does not represent Jerusalem, contrary to some interpretations. It is likely that at that moment, the apostles, in their simple understanding, were confused. To alleviate their doubts through a miracle, He caused the fig tree to wither before their eyes. Why did this compassionate Benefactor, who demonstrated abundance in scarcity and healing for every human ailment, command the fig tree to perish? He healed the sick, transformed water into wine, multiplied loaves, restored sight to the blind, cleansed the lepers, and raised the dead; yet, He explicitly commanded the fig tree to wither. Since the time of His suffering was approaching, to avoid any notion that He was captured due to His inability to escape, the Lord cursed the fig tree as a sign to His friends and a warning to His adversaries. This act strengthened the faith of His disciples through His word while astonishing outsiders with His power. Despite doing all things well yet being crucified, doubts might arise about His power being spent. Thus, by drying up a lifeless plant, He demonstrated that through His word, He could also bring ruin to those who crucified Him. As He executed this miracle with divine authority to affirm His strength beyond weakness in human form, He later instructed Simon, “put thy sword in its place” (cf. Matthew 26:52). He came to rid humanity of unseen afflictions and inflicted visible blows instead. He shattered the tombs, drowned the swine, and utterly withered the fig tree to illustrate that through the dismantling of the faithful’s tombs, He could also lay bare the hearts of the unfaithful; by vanquishing the herd of swine, He could eradicate the delusion of those rejecting faith; and, through the metaphor of the guiltless, withered fig tree, He intended to condemn Jerusalem for its transgressions. ‘He cried out; and came hastily up to the... fig tree.’ He adapted His visible actions and words to those who could see and hear. For those who captured Him, the Lord remained silent, unlike when addressing the fig tree. He withered it so that the Israelites might flourish once more, but they refused. He chose to be taken willingly, just as He descended from heaven at His own pleasure. Scripture relays that Adam, upon his fall from grace, concealed his nakedness with fig leaves (Genesis 3:7). Therefore, the Lord came and endured crucifixion to heal humanity’s wounds and restore the garment of glory to nakedness. By drying up the fig tree, He illustrated that the leaves of the fig tree, which once clothed Adam, were no longer necessary, as he had been restored to his former glory and had no need of leaves or animal skins. Thus, humanity has no further requirement for the withered fig tree, whose green leaves once served as a garment of shame and cover for disgrace."},{"author-name":"Anonymous Commentary (Opus Imperfectum)","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c96d263b8c22d9c467bdab_no-pic-theosis.png","category":"Christian Authors","century":4,"exegesis-text":"As he approached a fig tree along the path, he inspected it and found only leaves. This fig tree symbolizes the synagogue, for much like the numerous seeds found beneath its branches, it represents many believers gathered within one community—the synagogue, as it is stated, “God makes them dwell in one house with one accord” (Psalm 67:7). Observe how the leaves of the fig tree resemble human hands. Their lushness parallels the outward display of holiness among individuals who may engage in religious dialogue yet lack the fruit of righteous deeds. A person who views himself as religious—a tree possessing feelings—may think he belongs to God, but if he does not perform acts of righteousness, he is akin to a tree that yields leaves without fruit. As the apostle warned, “Know therefore that in the last days there will come hard times. For men shall be self-loving, covetous, proud, haughty, evil speaking, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, unholy, unfriendly, unreconciled, slanderers, impenitent, cruel, not loving kindness, traitors, insolent, pompous, more glory-loving than God-loving, having the appearance of godliness, but denying the power thereof” (2 Tim. 3:1-5). The path where this fig tree was located symbolizes the world. Christ found no fruit among the Jews because they led worldly lives, in accordance with the ways of the world. The world represents the course trod by all, as depicted in the parable of the sower. A person of faith, likened to a tree with senses, cannot produce the fruits of righteousness while living in accordance with worldly pursuits."},{"author-name":"Isidore of Pelusium","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c88d94130e668938c9ae9d_Isidore%20of%20Pelusium.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":5,"exegesis-text":"The Lord's act of cursing the fig tree was not arbitrary; rather, it served to demonstrate to the ungrateful Israelites His power to enact judgment as well. Throughout His miraculous works, they observed that He inflicted no harm upon anyone, leading them to believe that He was solely a doer of good, lacking the authority to reprimand the wicked. Thus, through the withering of the tree, the Lord impresses upon humanity that He possesses the ability to punish, though He chooses not to in His infinite goodness. This act was intended to instill fear in the hearts of men. Additionally, there is a deeper significance to this event, as handed down by wise elders, which indicates that the fig tree symbolizes disobedience; its leaves were utilized by those who transgressed God’s command to cloak their shame. Christ, in His mercy, cursed the tree so that it would cease to yield fruit that leads to sin. The Second Coming of Christ will not be for the salvation of mankind, but for the judgment of each individual based on their deeds."},{"author-name":"Romanos Melodos","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c89774ed5fa62ff880bee5_Romanos%20Melodos.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":6,"exegesis-text":"In contemplating the barrenness of the fig tree, let us extinguish the allure of sinful desires through acts of charity, so that we may pursue the resurrection with fervor, offering our forgiveness from above like a sweet fragrance; for the Ever-Watchful One observes all creation."},{"author-name":"Maximus the Confessor","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c8951a1dea23713695271e_Maximus%20the%20Confessor.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":7,"exegesis-text":"What is the significance of the withered fig tree referenced in the Gospel (Matt. 21:18-21; Mk. 11:12-14), which may appear perplexing at first glance? Why this excessive yearning for fruit at a moment not intended for harvest? And what drives the curse upon an inanimate object? The answer lies in the fact that God the Word, who judiciously organizes all for humanity’s salvation, initially educated mankind through the law, which was heavily rooted in physical observances. This was necessary, as human beings were incapable of understanding the truth without the aid of figures and shadows, due to their ignorance and detachment from the divine reality. In His incarnation, He manifested Himself, becoming flesh and possessing a rational soul, guiding human nature toward a spiritual and immaterial engagement. It was His intention that, as the Truth became evident in life, the mere shadow represented by the fig tree should not prevail. Therefore, the Holy Scriptures indicate that as He returned from Bethany to Jerusalem (Matthew 21:18; Mark 11:12), it symbolized God's return to human nature through the incarnation, following the previous representational coming enshrined in the law.\\n\\nThe words should thus be interpreted: During His return, He encountered a fig tree along the way displaying only leaves (Matt. 21:18; Mark 11:13)—a symbol of the physical observance of the law, which was mere shadow, resting upon an unstable and transient tradition of outward customs lacking true substance. Upon witnessing this ministry, adorned richly like the fig tree's leaves with the externalities of the law, yet fruitless—devoid of authentic truth—He cursed it for failing to nurture the Word of God. He commanded that henceforth, truth should not remain concealed beneath the pretense of the law’s images. This was fulfilled, as history shows, when the superficial splendor of the law, existing solely in outward forms, withered away, extinguishing the pride of the Jewish people. \\n\\nIt was unwise and inappropriate for the mere service of the law to disguise the harbingers of righteousness once the truth of those fruits had been clearly unveiled, leading seekers astray from the true nourishment found in the Word. Thus, the Holy Scriptures affirm: It was not the season for harvesting figs (Mk. 11:13), indicating that the time during which the law wielded dominion over humanity was not the time of true righteousness, but rather a shadow pointing to the forthcoming divine and ineffable grace that would save all. Without this grace, those of old perished through unbelief. The apostle rightly states that Israel, which sought the law of righteousness—this law represented in shadows and figures—failed to achieve true righteousness (Rom. 9:31), unable to attain the perfect law in spirit that Christ embodies. Similarly, the multitude of priests, scribes, lawyers, and Pharisees, consumed by vanity, believed they unveiled truth through their established morals, bolstered by hubris. The Scriptures label their arrogance as a barren fig tree, magnificent only in its outer leaves. The Lord, eager for the salvation of all and their rightful worship, withers it, rendering it barren, so that instead of self-righteousness, individuals may seek true righteousness, shedding the hypocritical garment of superficial morality. As the divine Word desires, they should earnestly pursue virtue and live righteously, revealing their inner spiritual state to God rather than performing for the approval of men.\\n\\nHowever, if any among us Christians present this outward morality without embodying righteous deeds, let us recognize that the merciful Word of God, longing for our salvation, may dry up the root of pride within our souls—no longer allowing it to bear the fruit of corruption that is self-righteousness. This, to the best of my understanding, conveys the essence of the narrative presented. From this interpretation, we can discern in what manner the Lord earnestly desires, how wisely He curses the fig tree, and in due time withers it, as it stands as an impediment to the truth—whether we consider it the ancient customs rooted in the observances of the law or the prideful moral posturing exhibited by the Pharisees and ourselves."},{"author-name":"John Damascene","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c88f1652142a026a0c6d53_John%20Damascene.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":8,"exegesis-text":"In His urgent desire to take on the cup of death for the redemption of all humanity, our Savior swiftly approaches suffering, driven by a longing for the salvation of mankind, yet he finds nothing to nourish this thirst. This emptiness is symbolized by the fig tree (Matthew 21:19). Who is this figure seeking sustenance in the early morning hours? He is the King, the Lord, and the Teacher. Did He truly experience hunger at such an early hour and seek food at an inappropriate time? Why did He instruct His followers to fast and temper their desires? What does this signify? - Your Lord, who imparted wisdom through parables, sometimes illustrated truths through His actions. Behold, He approached the fig tree. The fig tree represents humanity. While the fruit it bears is sweet, its leaves are coarse and worthless, fit only for burning. Such is human nature: created by God to yield the finest fruits of virtue, yet instead it produces only rough leaves. For what could be coarser than the distractions of life? - Once, Adam and Eve were naked and felt no shame, living purely and innocently; they knew nothing of crafts or worldly concerns and sought no means to cover their physical nakedness. Yet, although they lacked physical garments, they were adorned by God's grace; with no material covering, they were draped in the garment of immortality as they approached God through obedience to His will. However, once they disobeyed, they lost the grace that had clothed them, became aware of their nakedness, and yearned for worldly pleasures, leading them to a life of wretchedness. They stitched fig leaves together to make belts, became engrossed in troubling thoughts, and found themselves burdened with anxiety and grief. \\"In the sweat of your brow, you will eat your bread,\\" declares God. \\"Cursed is the soil because of you; thorns and thistles it will produce for you, and you will return to the ground\\" (Genesis 3:18-19). With an earthly mindset, you shall turn back to the earth; like unthinking beasts, you have received fleeting honor (Psalm 48:13); though made in the image of God, you have turned your back on true virtue, opting instead for earthly pleasures and a life devoid of purpose. You are dust, and to dust you shall return, inheriting death alongside the mute creatures of the earth. From this point on, humanity began to be clothed in garments of skin. Once dwelling in the paradise of delight, in a regal abode, and standing between life and decay, it now wears a corruptible and mortal body subject to ailments. Indeed, the fig tree's leaves are coarse, mirroring our nature, and its actions sinful! To this fig tree—representative of human nature—the Savior came, hungry, seeking the sweetest fruit of virtue, pleasing to God, which is essential for our salvation. Yet, apart from leaves—namely, the bitter sin and misfortunes that sprout from it—He found nothing. Therefore, He declared to it: \\"Let there be no fruit from you\\" (Matthew 21:19). Salvation does not come from humanity, nor is virtue derived from human strength. I will orchestrate salvation; granting resurrection through My sufferings, I will also provide liberation from life's sorrows. And indeed, He accomplished this."},{"author-name":"Andrew of Crete","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c889007b8398dd095b2389_Andrew%20of%20Crete.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":8,"exegesis-text":"Let us avoid this, so we do not fade away as happened before, when the assembly, adorned with leaves, was inscribed. The fig tree that bore no fruit has departed, dear brethren; let us grasp the significance of this image, so we do not wither as it occurred when the Compassionate One returned to find it hungry. The first man partook of the tree, realizing his own nakedness and shame, and covered himself with a fig leaf; thus, the exposed assembly of the unveiled Christ was symbolized. \\n\\nLawlessness is alien to the lawless, just as piety is unfamiliar to those who are unfaithful; yet the Jews rejected these truths because of their wickedness. Nevertheless, they will inherit, akin to the fig tree, the divine covenant. The root of humanity’s salvation, the bread of life, is Christ, our God. With this in mind concerning the fig tree, the barren entity that has seemingly produced leaves, it stands cursed. You condemned the fruitlessness found in the law, like a leaf thriving in written words but yielding no fruits of righteousness due to sin. Yet bless us, O Savior, all children of grace. For the staff of Moses was transformed from a serpent, and Aaron's rod once flourished with life; even the leaf will sprout. However, the unproductive council of the law-breaker will become like a fruitless fig tree."},{"author-name":"Theophylact of Bulgaria","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c8989296bafed9104677d7_Theophylact%20of%20Bulgaria.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":11,"exegesis-text":"The Lord has frequently performed wonders, and these acts have always been benevolent. He had never before executed a miracle intended to exact punishment. To counter any belief that He is unable to chastise, the Lord demonstrates His capacity for judgment in this instance. However, in His mercy, He directs this power not towards individuals but towards a tree, similar to His earlier actions with a herd of swine. By causing the tree to wither, He aims to provide understanding to the people. The disciples were astonished—truly amazed—because the tree was lush and the miraculous nature of its immediate desiccation was undeniable. The fig tree represents the Jewish synagogue, which bears only the outward appearance of life, signifying superficial adherence to the law but lacking genuine spiritual nourishment. Likewise, anyone who indulges solely in earthly pleasures resembles this fig tree: providing no spiritual sustenance for the hungry Christ, only the fleeting facade of leaves. Such a person will face a curse upon themselves; as it is written, “Depart from me, ye cursed, into the fire.” They will also experience desiccation; even their tongue will be parched amid the agony of the flames, akin to the rich man depicted in the Gospel."},{"author-name":"Theophan the Recluse","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c8983a6e0f4c3aecaae3fc_Theophan%20the%20Recluse.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":19,"exegesis-text":"The Lord condemned the fig tree to a state of fruitlessness because it was adorned with an abundance of leaves, yet bore no actual fruit. In the context of Christian living, the leaves represent outward expressions of faith and religious activities, while the fruit symbolizes the true inner transformations of the heart. According to divine order, the latter should naturally spring forth from the former; however, due to God's understanding of human frailty, there can be a notable disparity: the inner transformation must manifest alongside the outward actions. When the outer expressions are prominent but the inner growth is entirely absent, it leads to a false semblance of life, characterized by the notion of appearing righteous while lacking true authenticity. Initially, this dissonance might not be evident, but gradually, a deceptive structure of existence takes shape. Those who become overly fixated on appearances neglect their inner spiritual condition, leading to a state of spiritual dullness and coldness. At this juncture, genuine spiritual life halts; only a façade of devotion remains. While outward conduct may seem proper, internally, the reality is in turmoil. The result is a barren spiritual existence: actions are performed, but they lack vitality."},{"author-name":"Michail (Lusin)","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c89550c567e172d15b3055_Michail%20(Lusin).png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"In reference to the fig tree positioned along the public path, it was accessible for anyone to gather its fruit (cf. Deut. 23:24). The Lord approached it with the expectation of finding something to quell His hunger, not because He was unaware of its barrenness, but rather as an expression of His humanity. The tree was laden with leaves; typically, fig trees produce their fruit before developing foliage, so this leaf-laden tree might have been anticipated to yield early figs, known as ‘bokkoras,’ yet it bore none. When He declared, ‘Let there be no more,’ it signified a curse (Mk. 11:21), which became evident as the fig tree dried up. The purpose behind this curse was for the benefit of the disciples, to provide them with encouragement. Since the Lord was inherently kind and never punished anyone, it became essential for Him to demonstrate the reality of His justice and judgment, enabling both His disciples and the Jewish people to comprehend that while He had the power to wither His crucifiers like the fig tree, He chose to surrender Himself to crucifixion. Rather than enacting His judgment on people, He illustrated His justice upon a plant. Furthermore, He exhibited His authority over the fig tree, which is the most fruitful of all trees, accentuating the miraculous nature of what occurred (3Lat., cf. Theophilus). This fig tree symbolized the Jewish people, and its curse mirrored the rejection of the Jews. Although the tree was leafy and appeared to possess fruit, reflecting the Jews' outward religious observance and adherence to customs, it ultimately bore no fruit. Consequently, just as the fig tree withered, the Jewish people faced rejection by God."},{"author-name":"Abbot Panteleimon about the Trinity","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c96d263b8c22d9c467bdab_no-pic-theosis.png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"As He approached a solitary fig tree by the roadside, unique for its abundant leaves, He sought to find nourishment from its fruit. The All-Knowing One understood its nature. Although it was not the season for figs, there exist fig trees that bear fruit throughout winter, ripening into spring alongside fresh foliage. Additionally, it is common for new figs to appear before the leaves emerge, leading one to anticipate fruit from a tree adorned so richly with leaves. However, upon inspection, He discovered the tree was entirely barren, having not a single winter fig nor a trace of summer fruit. He found only leaves, rendering it unproductive and without future promise: “for why should it occupy the ground?” (Luke 13:7). Then the Lord, with calm assurance yet authoritative as the Creator, delivered His Divine decree upon that lifeless tree: “YOU SHALL NEVER BEAR FRUIT AGAIN! Let no one ever eat from you!” Immediately, the fig tree withered.\\n\\nSt. Chrysostom raises the question of why a lifeless tree is subjected to a curse and provides an answer: “Christ demonstrates His ability to punish adversaries while voluntarily choosing the path to crucifixion. His mission was to seek and redeem the lost, and throughout His ministry, He generously healed and restored many. Yet, He also needed to manifest, at least once, that as the Savior of the world, He will ultimately serve as the Judge of humanity. The goodness of God, even with His mighty intervention, can never overlook sin and malice. This act of judgment and divine retribution was invoked against a mere fig tree—a symbol of barrenness found in abundance in Palestine, standing by the roadside devoid of value and, reflecting its infertility, was destined to wither. \\n\\nThe monk Ephraim of Syria notes, “the Lord cursed the fig tree so that it might serve as a beacon for friends and a caution for foes. He withered the fig tree to signify the redundancy of the fig leaves Adam used to cover himself; for he was restored to his original splendor, needing neither leaves nor crafted garments” (Gen. 3:7). Blessed Theophylact observes that “the fig tree symbolizes the Jewish synagogue, which only possesses leaves, signifying the outward expression, yet lacks the spiritual fruit. Similarly, every individual indulging in worldly pleasures resembles the fig tree: they bear no spiritual sustenance for the seeking Savior, only leaves—the fleeting shadows of this life. They shall hear the words: ‘Depart from Me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels’ (Matt. 25:41). Consequently, they will face torment, and their tongues will wither like that of the rich man in the parable (Luke 16:24).”\\n\\nThe Lord searched for fruit on the fig tree, though the season for figs had not yet arrived. He anticipated a spirit of repentance from the Jewish people, even though it was not yet the time for ultimate judgment. The fig tree's lush leaves suggested it should yield fruit; similarly, the Jews possessed the Law, the rituals, the teachings of the prophets—all necessary for generating fruits of repentance ahead of the other nations. Yet, they only reveled in these privileges without producing any fruit. The Lord’s curse rendered the fig tree lifeless and barren; He dismissed the Jewish nation, leaving it an arid, unresponsive tree incapable of nurturing the true knowledge of God or quenching the thirst of a soul yearning for salvation. Like the withered fig tree, it stands as a solemn testament on the path to the heavenly Jerusalem, embodying God's judgment upon the unrepentant sinner.\\n\\nInnocent, the Archbishop of Kherson, explains that the unproductive fig tree has long served as a symbol for the sinner. The Evangelist Luke recounts a parable featuring a fig tree, which was spared in the hope of future fruitfulness, only to be threatened with removal and destruction, illustrating God’s patience towards wrongdoers. Now, the fig tree is condemned for its lack of fruitfulness, signifying divine justice that will ultimately hold the unrepentant accountable. The earlier parable provided insight into Christ’s judgment of the fig tree, reinforcing the lesson that God's mercy has a limit and that unrepentance, especially hypocrisy, attracts divine retribution. The following day, as He journeyed again with His disciples from Bethany to Jerusalem, the fig tree He had cursed was entirely withered."},{"author-name":"Gladkow B.I.","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c88bf0ceef8c96e09a6521_Gladkow%20B.I..png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"Jesus, while traveling, felt hunger and noticed a fig tree full of leaves by the roadside. He approached it hoping to find fruit to ease his hunger, but upon discovering it bore no figs, He proclaimed, “From now on, let no one eat fruit from you forever!” (Mark 11:14). Up to this point, we have perceived that wherever Jesus went, He generously spread goodness around Him. Yet, here we hear a severe judgment directed at a lifeless fig tree for failing to yield fruit when it arguably should not. The all-knowing Christ was aware that no fruit would be present on this fig tree; so why did He seek it? Typically, fruit trees blossom and produce fruit before they develop leaves, which is true for fig trees in Palestine. However, there exists a variety that retains both leaves and late fruit until spring. Mark, the Evangelist, notes that the season for gathering figs had not yet arrived, yet he attests that the fig tree Jesus saw from a distance was adorned with leaves; therefore, it might have held the fruit from the previous year, despite the current season not being for fig gathering, especially since other fig trees stood bare of leaves and fruit. In essence, the tree's appearance suggested that it could indeed bear fruit, thereby continuing the allegory of the fig tree recounted to the apostles earlier, as if to carry out the judgment that had previously been postponed. In that parable (Luke 13:6-9), the unproductive fig tree situated in the vineyard symbolized the Jewish people, from whom the vineyard owner, God, demanded fruit—namely, faith in the Messiah He had sent, along with repentance and righteous deeds. With the conclusion of the third year of Jesus’ ministry approaching and God's fig tree still yielding no fruit, the vineyard owner, representing God, instructed the vineyard caretaker, Jesus Christ, “Cut it down: why does it occupy the earth?” (Luke 13:7), implying that this obstinate people should be forsaken. The promise of new nations willing to believe and fulfill His will would take their place. Nevertheless, the compassionate Vinedresser reasoned to delay this judgment, hoping that extraordinary efforts on His part might inspire the nation to produce the anticipated fruits: “Leave it for this year, but if it does not bear fruit, next year you will cut it down” (Luke 13:8-9). Despite the extraordinary interventions by the Vinedresser, including numerous miracles and the resurrection of Lazarus, the fig tree remained unproductive, signaling that the time had come for it to be cut down. Christ could not be swayed by the crowds’ jubilant cries of hosanna, knowing that within just four days, those same throngs would demand, “Crucify Him, crucify Him!” (Luke 23:21). Indeed, it was time to remove the unfruitful fig tree. As if to extend the parable, Christ the Vinedresser approached the fig tree, which stood out starkly among the other trees—those other trees were not only barren but devoid of leaves, while this one displayed an abundance of lush foliage, concealing its lack of fruit. To declare its barrenness and carry out the previously delayed judgment, it was necessary for Jesus to draw closer, revealing to the apostles that it truly was unproductive, thus occupying the ground in vain. This is the reason Jesus sought fruit on the barren fig tree, knowing full well there would be none; thus, He condemned it, even though a fig tree cannot be held accountable for its lack of figs. The condemnation was not of the fig tree itself but rather of the Jewish people, who were ultimately rejected from God's vineyard; the tree, as an inanimate object, served solely as a representation of the desolation of His chosen nation. This parable and the final pronouncement of judgment on the barren fig tree can also resonate with us as sinners. If I endeavor to appear righteous, attending church, lighting candles before icons, and making earthly bowing gestures; if I discuss with friends the decline of faith and piety in others, criticize their faults, and emphasize the importance of aiding my neighbors; if all this is eloquent in my speech, but my heart is distant from these noble expressions; if I engage in no acts of kindness or assistance to those around me, am I not like the fig tree, adorned with abundant leaves yet yielding no fruit? And what will be my fate? The same as that of the unproductive fig tree. They arrived in Bethany, likely quite late, as it was already dark. When they passed the condemned fig tree the following morning, the apostles did not distinguish it from the other fig trees, which remained leafless, nor did they recognize that it had withered. It was Monday."}]}
Support this project and get full access for only 4$/month
Commentarie text can’t be scrolled on PC at the moment. Please use your phone. We’re working on a fix.
