←
Explanation for:
Matthew
16
:
21
From that time Jesus began to shew to his disciples, that he must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the ancients and scribes and chief priests, and be put to death, and the third day rise again.
11
more explanations
& daily audio-books
spoken by
– enjoy in Theosis App –
Start your
Bible-journey
with explanations
& daily audio-books
only 4$* per month
{"arr":[{"author-name":"Irenaeus of Lyon","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c88d41db83be493e87135c_Irenaeus%20of%20Lyon.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":2,"exegesis-text":"The Lord Himself makes it clear who endured suffering. St. Irenaeus counters those who claim that Jesus was simply a man who experienced hardship while the Son of God simply escaped. When He inquired of His disciples, “Who do people say that I, the Son of Man, am?” and Peter responded, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God,” he was affirmed by Jesus: “For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven” (Matt. 16:13, 16-17). This exchange demonstrated that He, identifying as the Son of Man, is indeed the Christ, the Son of the living God. From that moment, it is noted that He began to reveal to His disciples that He must journey to Jerusalem, endure great suffering at the hands of the religious leaders, face rejection, be crucified, and rise again on the third day. He, acknowledged as the Son of Man and recognized by Peter as the Christ, who was blessed for receiving this revelation from the Father, proclaimed that He must indeed suffer and be crucified."},{"author-name":"Jerome of Stridon","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c88dcd3432c6dd41375498_Jerome%20of%20Stridon.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":4,"exegesis-text":"The message is this: Proclaim My name after I have suffered these trials; it is futile to speak of Christ in a superficial manner while announcing to the world the One who will later be beaten, affixed to the cross, and subjected to various indignities by the religious leaders, scholars, and chief priests. Today, Jesus faces a similar fate from those who, in their hearts, re-crucify the Son of God, as mentioned in Hebrews 6:6. Even though these individuals may hold positions as elders in the church and leaders among the priests, they repeat the act of crucifying the Son of God, who is intimately understood by the spirit, yet they remain bound by the letter of the law."},{"author-name":"John Chrysostom","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c88ea76859f9f8e2ffd3ee_John%20Chrysostom.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":4,"exegesis-text":"Peter, relying on his own human and worldly reasoning, perceived suffering as disgraceful and unkind towards Christ. Understanding his thoughts, Christ responded, stating, “Suffering is not foreign to My nature; rather, you assess it through your earthly perspective. If you had expressed My words in the Holy Spirit, unclouded by worldly concerns, you would comprehend that it is fitting for Me. You consider it beneath My dignity to endure suffering, yet I tell you that viewing it this way is a temptation from the adversary.” Christ reassured Peter by confronting his worries with the opposite truth. Much like when He encouraged John, who felt it was inappropriate for Christ to be baptized by him, saying, “This is how we must fulfil all righteousness” (Matthew 3:5), and when He instructed Peter, who hesitated to allow Him to wash his feet, declaring, “If I do not wash you, you have no part with Me” (John 13:8), here as well, through the fear of the contrary and a firm rebuke, He enlightened Peter, dispelling the fear ignited by suffering."},{"author-name":"Ambrose of Milan","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c88871ceef8c96e0998cd0_Ambrose%20of%20Milan.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":4,"exegesis-text":"The Lord understood that even His own disciples might struggle to accept the reality of His afflictions and resurrection. Therefore, He chose to declare His suffering and resurrection, so that faith could emerge from actions rather than conflict born from hearsay. Christ did not seek to boast, preferring to remain in humility, allowing Himself to endure suffering. The path that Christ has walked is the same path intended for you, and recognizing Him entails imitating Him in both humility and glory, as expressed in 2 Corinthians 6:8, where one can boast only in the cross, just as He did. Paul followed this example, stating, \\"But God forbid that I should boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ\\" (Galatians 6:14).\\n\\nLet us examine why Matthew’s Gospel conveys that the disciples were instructed not to declare Him as the Christ (see Matthew 16:20), as it is noted that He commanded them to remain silent about His suffering and resurrection. In fact, everything essential is encompassed within the name of Christ. He is the One born of a virgin, the One who performed miracles, who died for our transgressions and rose again. To deny any aspect of His identity is to forfeit salvation. Heretics may claim possession of Christ's name; however, those who fail to acknowledge all that Christ embodies are, in truth, denying Him. For various reasons, Christ desired the disciples to hold their tongues to confuse the ruler of this world, to reject pride, and to foster humility, ensuring that the still-maturing disciples would not feel overwhelmed by the weight of such a profound mission.\\n\\nNow, let us consider the rationale behind His command for silence among unclean spirits. The Scriptures reveal this as the Lord asked a transgressor, \\"Why do you declare My statutes?\\" (Psalm 49:16). This is so that those listening to the preacher may not fall into the deceptions of the enemy, for the devil is an unsuitable guide—frequently substituting falsehoods for truth, aiming to mask his lies with the appearance of reality.\\n\\nNext, we should contemplate whether this was the first instance of Him instructing His disciples to remain silent about His identity as the Christ or if it had been previously addressed when He sent out the twelve apostles, giving them specific guidance: “Do not go the way of the Gentiles, nor enter a city of the Samaritans, but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel... Heal the sick, cleanse lepers, raise the dead, cast out demons” (Matthew 10:5-6, 8). It seems here that they faced no reprimand for preaching Christ, the Son of God.\\n\\nThus, the sequence of our reasoning forms the basis of interpretation. When evangelizing the Gentiles, we must gradually present the commandments, starting with the declaration that the Creator of everything is one God, a point echoed in Acts 17:24-31. In this God, we have our existence; hence we ought to love Him not only for life and light but for all humanity. It is essential to dismantle the prevalent notions about idols, demonstrating that the substances of gold, silver, or wood cannot encapsulate divine power. Once belief in the oneness of God is established, we should then illustrate that salvation is granted through Christ, beginning with His earthly actions, while revealing the qualities of His divine nature that confirm His supremacy beyond humanity.\\n\\nDemonstrate that He overcame death by His own power, rising from hell after His demise. Faith develops progressively; as people realize that He is far beyond mere mortals, they will come to believe in His deity. If one cannot substantiate the divine power behind His deeds, how can they argue for the existence of such power within Him?\\n\\nIs our authority insufficient, and our credibility lacking? Reference Paul’s sermon to the Athenians. Had he sought to eradicate idolatry right away, the Gentiles would have dismissed him. Instead, he began by proclaiming one God, the Creator of all: \\"God who made the world and everything in it\\" (Acts 17:24). They could not contest that one Creator exists. The apostle remarked that it would be inappropriate for the Lord of heaven and earth to reside in structures built by human hands, and that it is utterly implausible for the divine essence to be confined to inert materials like gold or silver. He pointed them toward a desire for repentance and eventually mentioned Christ. At this stage, he referred to Him as man, saying, “He has given assurance of this to all by raising Him from the dead” (Acts 17:31). It is crucial to consider the listeners' disposition, as they might scoff rather than listen. Would the Athenians have accepted that the Word became flesh (John 1:14) and that the Virgin conceived through the Spirit (see Matthew 1:18-23; Luke 1:26-38) if they mocked the resurrection? Still, Dionysius the Areopagite and others believed in Him as a man (Acts 17:34), eventually acknowledging Him as God. The order of belief does not alter the outcome; initial beliefs need not be perfect but can evolve towards perfection. This is the approach Paul modeled for the Athenians, which we should likewise apply to the Gentiles.\\n\\nHowever, when the apostles addressed the Jews, they proclaimed that He was the Christ foretold by the prophets. Early on, they did not assert His identity as the Son of God, instead presenting Him as the man foretold, the righteous one, the one raised from the dead (see Acts 2:32-36; Acts 3:14; Acts 13:23-30). In this manner, affirm beliefs that may seem challenging by citing Scripture; demonstrate that His arrival was prophesied by the prophets and that His resurrection was foretold long before, not in reference to a universal resurrection, but as evidence of His eternal divinity through the specific resurrection of His body. By contrasting the decay of others’ bodies after death, you reinforce that He, of whom it is said, \\"You will not allow Your Holy One to see corruption\\" (Psalm 16:10), is exempt from human decay, establishing His superiority over human nature and likening Him more to God than to men.\\n\\nShould you require further enlightenment, realize that He stands alone in comparison to God rather than man. If an individual preparing for the sacraments needs guidance, one must state that there is one God, from whom all things originate, and one Jesus Christ, through whom all things exist (1 Corinthians 8:6). They cannot be regarded as two distinct Lords. The Father is perfect, the Son is perfect, yet both share the same essence. The Son is the eternal Word of God, not spoken into existence but emanating from the Father. Thus, the apostles were instructed not to disseminate the revelation of Him as the Son of God immediately, so that they could later share the message of the crucifixion. This embodies the pinnacle of faith: to grasp the significance of Christ’s cross. Other forms of suffering bear no utility for me; only the cross of Christ brings true purpose, by which the world is rendered dead to me, and I to the world (Galatians 6:14). If the world is dead to me, I recognize its lifelessness and sever my affections for it; I understand that the world is transient and do not covet it; I see that corruption will consume the world and regard it as repulsive; I flee from it as one would from a plague, abandoning it as one would a devastating blight.\\n\\nNot everyone can immediately accept that salvation has arrived through the cross. Utilize historical instances from Greek history to illustrate that such a possibility exists. The apostle sometimes taught nonbelievers using quotes from pagan sources (see Acts 17:28), dismantling the myths of poets. Recall tales from Greek history where entire armies or nations were rescued through the sacrifice of individuals, such as the Athenian king Codrus, who gave his life for his nation's victory over the Dorians, as noted by Valerius Maximus in \\"Dostopamamematae Acts and Sayings\\" (5.6). Consider the account of Iphigenia, the daughter of Agamemnon, sacrificed to enable the Greek army's journey to Troy. Further, scripture states: \\"The blood of goats and bulls and the ashes of a heifer sprinkled on those who are ceremonially unclean sanctify them so that they are outwardly clean\\" (Hebrews 9:13). It is also noted that calamities caused by human sins are averted through the death of one. Whether these occurrences are seen as having reasonable explanations or regarded as providential acts, they serve to ease the acceptance of faith in the cross of Christ among hearers, who will find it challenging to dispute their own histories.\\n\\nNo man was ever so great as to atone for the sins of the entire world; neither Enoch nor Abraham could do so. Even Isaac, though he was nearly sacrificed, was spared from death (see Genesis 22:11-13) because he alone could not bear the weight of all sin. Indeed, which individual of the many could carry the burden of sin for all? Thus, it was not a single member of the multitude who was chosen, but God’s Son. Being supreme, He could offer Himself for all. It was right for Him to perish, so that by being mightier than death, He might liberate others; therefore, among the dead, the powerless could find freedom (Psalm 88:5). Through His own strength, without assistance from man or any creation, He became truly free from death, having escaped the shackles of sinful desires and the chains of mortality."},{"author-name":"Theophylact of Bulgaria","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c8989296bafed9104677d7_Theophylact%20of%20Bulgaria.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":11,"exegesis-text":"The Lord informs His disciples about His impending sufferings in advance, ensuring that when these events unfold unexpectedly, they will not be led to believe that He lacked foresight or endured it against His will. Upon recognizing through Peter's declaration that He is the Son of God, He discloses to them the reality of His afflictions. Yet, alongside the sorrow He expresses, He also shares the promise of joy, declaring that on the third day He will rise from the dead."},{"author-name":"Euthymios Zigabenos","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c96d263b8c22d9c467bdab_no-pic-theosis.png","category":"Christian Authors","century":11,"exegesis-text":"From that moment, when the disciples had a solid understanding that He was inherently the Son of God, He began to reveal to them the trials He would face, ensuring that they would be prepared in advance and not doubt or interpret His suffering as a result of any frailty in His nature. After all, how could one entertain such thoughts about Him who anticipates, prophesies, and even zealously embraces His own suffering?"},{"author-name":"Theophan the Recluse","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c8983a6e0f4c3aecaae3fc_Theophan%20the%20Recluse.png","category":"Holy Fathers and Teachers","century":19,"exegesis-text":"When the holy apostles recognized the Savior as the Son of God, He affirmed, “must ... suffer... and be killed.” The situation was prepared, and it needed only to be fulfilled through the crucifixion. This reflects the journey of a Christian’s moral development. In the midst of battling personal desires, the adversary continues to seek ways to tempt. However, when these desires diminish and the enemy loses the ability to provoke them, he then unleashes external trials—various accusations and, more acutely, the most sensitive attacks. The adversary attempts to instill the thought: “Why have you toiled and fought? It brings no benefit to you.” Yet, as he readies for this external onslaught, the Lord bestows upon His servant a spirit of endurance, preparing within his heart a fervent willingness to face all forms of suffering and opposition, rendering the enemy's attack ineffective. Just as the Lord declared of Himself that He “must suffer,” they too develop a yearning for afflictions. When such trials arise, they embrace them with joy, savoring them like a thirsty person relishing cool water."},{"author-name":"Michail (Lusin)","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c89550c567e172d15b3055_Michail%20(Lusin).png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"From that moment, Jesus commenced to speak openly about His impending sufferings and death, having previously only alluded to them in a more intimate manner (Matt. 10:28, Matt. 12:40, John 2:19, John 3:14). Now, He addressed His disciples directly. Previously, it would have been wholly incongruous for them to accept such notions, given the prevalent carnal perceptions held by the Jewish people regarding the Messiah, a view that the apostles sometimes shared. However, in light of Peter's confession, which confirmed the disciples’ unwavering recognition of Him as the Messiah, it became essential to prepare them for a clearer understanding of the Messiah’s earthly journey. This idea could be more readily reconciled with their steadfast faith in Jesus, although it still posed challenges for their understanding (cf. Luke 18:34), as exemplified by Peter's reaction (Matt. 16:22-23). Their expectation remained fixated on the Messiah as a temporal king of Israel, a belief they had nurtured for a considerable time (cf. Acts 1:6). After affirming their belief that He was indeed the Messiah through Peter's confession, the Lord, with profound wisdom, began to unveil the mysteries surrounding the earthly mission of the Messiah, aiming to correct their misconceptions.\\n\\nWhen He mentioned that He \\"must go to Jerusalem,\\" this did not imply that He had never visited the city before; according to the accounts of John the Evangelist, He had been there multiple times prior to this moment. Here, He speaks prophetically of His final journey to Jerusalem during the last Passover, when He would face suffering and death. \\n\\nHis declaration concerning suffering at the hands of the elders, chief priests, and scribes refers to those who composed the Sanhedrin, which later condemned Christ (see note on Matthew 2:4, 5, 7). He also asserted that \\"on the third day rise again.\\" Given that later, when the Lord repeated this to them, the disciples failed to grasp His meaning (Luke 18:34) and did not believe in His resurrection for some time, even after it had occurred, indicating their struggle with understanding this reality (Luke 24:11 and parallels). Furthermore, it is noted in John's Gospel that Peter and John were unaware from Scripture that He would rise again (John 20:9). While Jesus began to speak more clearly about His suffering and resurrection following Peter’s acknowledgment, His references—even concerning the resurrection—remained somewhat veiled, preventing the disciples from fully comprehending His statements. They certainly understood the concept of resurrection since they had witnessed His miraculous acts involving the dead. The nature of their confusion during this discourse remains somewhat uncertain. They persisted in a degree of ignorance, not grasping what it truly meant to resurrect. Therefore, He elaborated on this challenging subject, seeking to enlighten them and facilitate their understanding of His words. Nevertheless, many failed to comprehend, and the significance of His message remained obscured to them. They did not fully realize the implications of resurrection and deemed it crucial to avoid death altogether."},{"author-name":"Abbot Panteleimon about the Trinity","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c96d263b8c22d9c467bdab_no-pic-theosis.png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"The apostles had begun to grasp and acknowledge not only the profound mystery of the incarnation of the Son of God but also understood that the redemption of humanity was realized not merely through the incarnation, but also through the suffering of the Redeemer. Thus, before they could proclaim His Divinity, it was essential for the apostles to comprehend and internalize another significant mystery—the mystery of the Lord's sacrificial suffering and His death. They believed that Jesus Christ was the Savior of the world; however, they did not yet comprehend how His salvation would unfold. This is why, immediately following their acknowledgment of His Divinity, the Lord explicitly communicated to them for the first time about His impending suffering and death in Jerusalem, which were prerequisites for the establishment of His Kingdom: From that moment Jesus began to disclose to His disciples and, with increasing frequency, emphasized that He must go to Jerusalem, endure many things at the hands of the elders and chief priests, be put to death, and on the third day rise again. The esteemed apostles, Peter, James, and John, were soon taught about this on Mount Tabor, where the two eminent prophets, Moses and Elijah, appeared from the realm beyond and spoke with the transfigured Lord concerning His forthcoming sufferings. Yet, even in this revelation, the Lord maintained a wise sense of gradualism. Until then, He had communicated these truths to the disciples and the crowd in a veiled manner. He hinted at it during His first visit to the Jerusalem temple when He stated, \\"Destroy this temple\\" (John 2:19), referenced it in His address to the Pharisees regarding the sign of Jonah the prophet, and further in His talks to the people about His body and blood. Even John the Baptist had identified Him as the Lamb who bears the sins of the world. However, none of this adequately prepared the disciples to receive a straightforward declaration of the suffering and death of the one whom they, along with other Jews, believed would endure forever. The Lord now disclosed to them that He would endure much suffering and be killed, subsequently stating that He would be handed over to the Gentiles and, just prior to His suffering, that He would face crucifixion. To alleviate the burden of these predictions on His disciples' hearts, He consistently assured them that He would rise on the third day. Yet, despite the clarity of the Lord's predictions regarding His impending sufferings, the apostles still did not grasp His message, for \\"these words were hidden from them\\" (Luke 18:34); they remained in a state of confusion, failing to understand the meaning of the resurrection and insisting instead that it was paramount that He would never die (St John Chrysostom)."},{"author-name":"Gladkow B.I.","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c88bf0ceef8c96e09a6521_Gladkow%20B.I..png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"In His discussions with the apostles regarding His forthcoming death, it was essential for them to be fortified in their faith and to come to terms with the reality of His suffering, death, and resurrection. Therefore, as soon as they identified Jesus as the genuine Messiah, He promptly began explaining to them that the true Messiah would not fulfill the expectations the Jews had of a worldly king. He clarified that His kingdom was not based on earthly glory but rather on divine majesty and spiritual sanctity. The authentic Messiah would not dominate or oppress the nations; instead, He would serve all and endure suffering for their liberation from sin—foretelling that He would be crucified, that He would die, and on the third day, He would rise again."},{"author-name":"Lopuchin A.P.","author-image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6864003fdf3714da6ff0b33a/68c891400ee1341634d2276d_Lopuchin%20A.P..png","category":"Christian Authors","century":19,"exegesis-text":"It was essential for them to understand that although He was the Messiah and their King, His dominion was not of this earthly realm. It was crucial to dispel any misguided expectations of worldly status or gain within the Messiah's reign, helping them to comprehend that the kingdom of God is defined not by mere physical sustenance, but by righteousness, peace, and the joy found in faith. Thus, He began to share with them, slowly and with clarity, about His forthcoming journey to Jerusalem, the rejection He would face from the leaders among the people, the humiliation and suffering He would endure, His sorrowful death, and ultimately, His resurrection on the third day. While He had previously alluded to His future afflictions, this was the first occasion on which He articulated them plainly and directly. However, He refrained from disclosing every detail concerning the horrific nature of His impending death. He indicated that He would be rejected by the elders, chief priests, and scribes—the various spiritual and temporal authorities—but did not mention that He would be turned over to the Gentiles. He cautioned them about His death, yet, right up until His final journey to Jerusalem, He withheld the devastating reality that He would be crucified."}]}
Support this project and get full access for only 4$/month
Commentarie text can’t be scrolled on PC at the moment. Please use your phone. We’re working on a fix.
